An older individual receiving an injection treatment for their forehead.

The global skin boosters market is projected to reach USD 1.36 billion by 2030, growing at a CAGR of 13.0% from 2025 to 2030. These hyaluronic acid-based micro-injections, enriched with vitamins and minerals, have become increasingly popular for their ability to hydrate, rejuvenate, and enhance skin quality without the need for invasive procedures.

Among the top choices, NCTF 135 HA and Juvelook Skin Booster have gained recognition for their skin-revitalizing properties. While both treatments improve skin texture and hydration, they differ in composition, mechanism of action, and intended benefits. Understanding these differences can help individuals and practitioners choose the most suitable option for their skincare needs.

In this article, we will compare NCTF 135 HA vs Juvelook Skin Booster, exploring their unique formulations, benefits, clinical evidence, and real before-and-after results to provide a comprehensive guide for those considering these treatments.

Key Takeaways

  • NCTF 135 HA and Juvelook skin booster promote skin rejuvenation but offer unique benefits tailored to different skin concerns.
  • NCTF 135 HA is formulated with hyaluronic acid, vitamins, and amino acids, making it ideal for hydration and skin revitalization.
  • Juvelook skin booster combines poly-D, L-lactic acid, and hyaluronic acid, focusing on volumizing and improving the appearance of fine lines and acne scars.
  • Understanding each product’s distinct ingredients and applications helps patients choose the best option for their specific skin needs and desired outcomes.

About: Medica Depot is your trusted all-in-one supplier, offering a range of high-quality medical injectables and supplies. Order Fillmed products online at Medica Depot today! Whether for health professionals, plastic surgeons, dermatologists, licensed estheticians, or other specialists, we can offer genuine, brand-name products you may need. With Medica Depot, we prioritize serving you better to improve the patient’s quality of life.

Composition and Mechanism of Action

A close-up shot of hyaluronic acid.

When comparing NCTF 135 HA vs Juvelook Skin Booster or other aesthetic treatments, understanding their composition and mechanisms of action is essential. This knowledge helps practitioners assess patient suitability and tailor treatments based on individual skin concerns and characteristics.

  • NCTF 135 HA: A powerful formulation that combines hyaluronic acid with 12 vitamins, 24 amino acids, 6 co-enzymes, 6 minerals, and nucleic acids. This nutrient-rich blend revitalizes the skin, improves hydration, and enhances overall skin quality.
  • Juvelook Skin Booster: A unique poly-D, L-lactic acid (PDLLA) and hyaluronic acid combination designed to stimulate collagen production, volumize the skin, and promote long-lasting skin rejuvenation.

Despite their different compositions, both NCTF 135 HA and Juvelook Skin Booster work by stimulating collagen production, leading to longer-lasting skin rejuvenation effects. Their unique blend of ingredients ensures deep hydration, improved skin texture, and visible reduction in aging signs, making them valuable options for non-invasive skin revitalization.

Indications and Treatment Areas

A thorough consultation with a qualified medical professional is essential for assessing a patient’s overall health, aesthetic concerns, and treatment goals. This process allows practitioners to develop a personalized treatment plan that aligns with the patient’s needs and expectations.

Additionally, consultations allow practitioners to educate patients about NCTF 135 HA and Juvelook, ensuring they make informed treatment decisions. This includes clarifying regulatory approvals, such as whether NCTF 135 HA is FDA-approved, or highlighting the FDA-approved PDLLA formulation in Juvelook. Understanding each injectable’s indications and treatment areas is also crucial for achieving optimal results.

  • NCTF 135 HA: Used for fine lines, deep hydration, and skin redensification in various facial and body areas, including the face (periorbital area), neck, chest, hands, and inner arms.
  • Juvelook Skin Booster: Primarily targets fine lines, acne scars, and skin firmness, providing volumizing effects in facial areas such as the forehead, temples, cheeks, and under-eye region.

By understanding each injectable’s unique benefits and treatment areas, practitioners can recommend the most suitable option for each patient’s skin concerns and desired outcomes.

Effectiveness and Patient Outcomes

By Day 75 and Day 120 of a clinical study, NCTF 135 HA significantly reduced wrinkles in all three areas. It also enhanced facial radiance scores compared to the control group. These findings confirm that NCTF 135 HA is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for visible signs of aging.

Similarly, a clinical study on Juvelook demonstrated that intradermal Poly-D, L-lactic acid (PDLLA) injections, administered via a microneedle fractional radiofrequency (MFRF) device, effectively treated acne scars with minimal side effects. This highlights Juvelook’s role in skin regeneration and scar improvement.

A patient's before and after photos of their eye region treatment with NCTF 135 HA.
Photo Source: Fillmed Laboratoires
A patient's before and after photo of their treatment with Juvelook skinbooster.
Photo Source: Juvelook

Juvelook and NCTF 135 HA before and after photos provide compelling visual evidence of their safety, effectiveness, and ability to achieve optimal aesthetic outcomes for those considering these treatments. Both injectables have clinically proven benefits in enhancing skin texture, reducing wrinkles, and stimulating collagen production, leading to improved skin firmness and overall rejuvenation.

Conclusion

Deciding between NCTF 135 HA and Juvelook Skin Booster comes down to your specific skin concerns and goals. NCTF 135 HA is a great choice if you’re looking to boost hydration, smooth fine lines, and improve overall skin texture. It works across multiple areas, including the face, neck, chest, and hands. This versatility makes it a great option for full-face and body rejuvenation.

On the other hand, Juvelook is better suited for those who want to restore volume in specific facial areas or reduce acne scars. By stimulating collagen production, it helps firm and smooth the skin, delivering long-lasting results.

Understanding what each treatment offers makes it easier to choose the one that best fits your needs. Consulting with a professional can help ensure you get the best possible results and achieve healthy, glowing skin.

FAQs

1. What are the main differences between NCTF 135 HA and Juvelook skinbooster?

NCTF 135 HA combines hyaluronic acid with vitamins, amino acids, and minerals to hydrate and rejuvenate the skin. At the same time, Juvelook primarily contains poly-D, L-lactic acid, and hyaluronic acid to help it volumize and improve its skin appearance. Their formulations result in different benefits for skin texture and concerns.

2. What areas can practitioners treat with NCTF 135 HA and Juvelook?

NCTF 135 HA is suitable for multiple areas, including the face, neck, chest, and hands, targeting fine lines and hydration. In contrast, Juvelook is mainly used on the face. This skin booster focuses on fine lines and acne scars. Juvelook also volumizes specific areas like the cheeks and forehead.

3. How effective are these treatments for improving skin quality?

Clinical studies show that NCTF 135 HA significantly reduces wrinkles and enhances skin radiance over time. Meanwhile, Juvelook effectively treats acne scars with minimal side effects. Both treatments stimulate collagen production, leading to improved skin firmness and texture.

Require assistance or custom offers?

Our sales representatives are here to help.

BOOK A MEETING

References

  1. Skin Boosters Market Size, Share & Trends Report, 2023 – 2030. (n.d.). Www.grandviewresearch.com. Retrieved February 6, 2025, from https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/skin-boosters-market-report
  2. Chen, S. Y., Lin, J. Y., & Lin, C. Y. (2019). Compositions of injectable poly‐d,l‐lactic acid and injectable poly‐l‐lactic acid. Clinical and Experimental Dermatology, 45(3), 347–348. https://doi.org/10.1111/ced.14085