Medical research highlights volume loss as a major contributor to visible signs of aging, such as fine lines around the nose, mouth, and sunken cheeks. According to the American Board of Cosmetic Surgery, thinning facial tissues play a significant role in these changes, prompting many individuals to seek effective aesthetic treatments.
Among the non-surgical solutions, skin boosters have gained popularity for rejuvenating the skin, reducing signs of aging, and restoring a youthful appearance. Sunekos and Profhilo are two standout treatments, known for their unique formulations that target the skin’s deeper layers to enhance hydration and vitality.
In this article, we will compare Sunekos vs Profhilo, exploring their formulations, mechanisms of action, effectiveness, and which skin concerns they best address.
Key Takeaways
- Sunekos and Profhilo’s unique ingredients and formulations add to their rising popularity in the aesthetic market.
- As both treatments utilize hyaluronic acid for collagen and elastin production, Sunekos added a unique mix of amino acids for additional benefits to the skin.
- Profhilo’s high concentrations of hyaluronic acid result in deep skin hydration.
- A thorough consultation with a medical professional allows them to explain the treatments, their benefits, potential Profhilo or Sunekos side effects, and post-treatment care.
About: Medica Depot is your trusted all-in-one supplier, offering a range of high-quality medical injectables and supplies. Order Sunekos online at Medica Depot today! Whether for health professionals, plastic surgeons, dermatologists, licensed estheticians, or other specialists, we can offer genuine, brand-name products you may need. With Medica Depot, we prioritize serving you better to improve the patient’s quality of life.
Introduction to Sunekos and Profhilo
Skin boosters continuously emerge as popular non-surgical choices for individuals seeking aesthetic enhancements. These injectable treatments often aim to enhance skin texture, elasticity, and hydration from within the deep layers of the skin for prolonged results.
Notably, medical professionals may compare Sunekos and Profhilo as effective injectable skin treatments. Their unique ingredients and formulations add to their rising popularity in the aesthetic market. Providers can help patients determine the most suitable product for their specific concerns.
The popularity of Sunekos and Profhilo lies in their efficacy in providing skin rejuvenation. Both skin treatments offer the following benefits, making them highly sought-after aesthetic solutions.
- Minimal to No Downtime
- Quick Procedure
- Natural-Looking Results
- Reduces Signs of Aging
- Enhances Overall Skin Health and Appearance
- Improves Quality of Life
Formulation and Composition
When comparing Sunekos vs Profhilo, individuals should understand the unique formulation that sets them apart from other aesthetic solutions. Skin boosters typically contain hyaluronic acid and other components that enhance skin health.
Interestingly, Sunekos skin booster uses a patented formulation that combines sodium hyaluronate (30 mg in 3 ml distilled water) with a specific mix of amino acids, such as sterile and apyrogenous lyophilized Glycine, L-Proline, L-Lysine HCP, L-Valine, and L-Alanine.
In contrast, Profhilo uses the NAHYCO Technology and capitalizes on one of the highest concentrations of hyaluronic acid in the aesthetic market for their injectable solution. Their difference in key ingredients highlights a comparison of effects for Sunekos and Profhilo.
As both treatments utilize hyaluronic acid for collagen and elastin production, Sunekos added a unique mix of amino acids for additional benefits to the skin. This allows Sunekos skin booster to target the extracellular matrix for better skin health and bioregeneration, while Profhilo mainly targets deep hydration to improve skin texture and firmness.
Mechanism of Action
Medical professionals should also explain how these injectable treatments work. This allows patients to understand their mechanisms of action, while knowing the Profhilo and Sunekos benefits for the treated skin.
The patented and combined formulation of hyaluronic acid and amino acids stimulates fibroblast activity to promote new collagen and elastin production. As Sunekos begins this stimulating activity in the skin, the skin booster enhances skin elasticity and firmness, leading to bioregeneration.
Profhilo’s high concentrations of hyaluronic acid result in deep skin hydration. It stimulates collagen and elastin production, only allowing slow release for improved skin texture, tightness, and overall skin health for an extended period.
While both treatments produce collagen and elastin, Sunekos skin booster differs as it targets the extracellular matrix for skin rejuvenation. Moreover, the additional mix of amino acids significantly helps provide impressive skin health and restore a youthful-looking appearance.
Effectiveness and Results
In a 2017 clinical trial, results demonstrated significant improvements in clinical and subjective assessments and most objective instrumental parameters. These improvements were noticeable ten days after the initial injection and continued to enhance over six months. The findings confirm the aesthetic efficacy of Sunekos 200 in addressing the primary signs of facial skin photoaging.
A safety assessment by Cassuto et al. (2020) reported only minor adverse events following Profhilo injections, underscoring the treatment’s high patient tolerability and safety. Additionally, another study demonstrated that low- and high-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid significantly improved facial skin quality, effectively fulfilling Profhilo’s bio-remodeling objectives.
Sunekos and Profhilo offer safety and efficacy in enhancing skin quality and rejuvenating skin. However, it’s worth noting that they have different targets: Sunekos excels in collagen and elastin stimulation for extracellular matrix bioregeneration, while Profhilo offers superior hydration and overall skin tightening. Selecting between the two treatments should be guided by specific skin concerns and the desired results.
Suitability for Different Skin Concerns
A thorough consultation with a medical professional allows them to explain the treatments, their benefits, potential Profhilo or Sunekos side effects, and post-treatment care. Moreover, they evaluate patient’s concerns, goals, and specific needs to determine their suitability for the treatments and create a tailored treatment plan for an individualized approach.
During this step, patients should also know the suitable skin concerns and indications of Sunekos and Profhilo. Understanding these can help individuals understand and select which product can primarily help them with their skin concerns.
- Sunekos: Due to different Sunekos skin boosters (200, 1200, Body, Performa), they aim for different suitability of skin concerns. It’s worth noting that these injectables can address fine lines and wrinkles to deeper wrinkles and sagging skin. Sunekos 200 can target the facial region, specifically the forehead, dark eye circles, and full face.
- Profhilo: Medical professionals may recommend this injectable for those experiencing signs of aging in the facial region until the neck area to enhance hydration, laxity, and quality. They also offer Profhilo Body for sagging skin to address different areas.
Both manufacturers of Sunekos and Profhilo developed their respective collections of injectables to address aging in different body areas and facial regions. Individuals need to seek medical providers’ expertise to find the most fitting product to maximize its benefits and align its safety and efficacy for each patient.
Conclusion
The comparison of Sunekos vs Profhilo reveals two distinct yet practical approaches to skin rejuvenation. Sunekos stands out with its unique blend of hyaluronic acid and amino acids, targeting the extracellular matrix for bioregeneration and improved skin health. In contrast, Profhilo’s high concentrations of hyaluronic acid provide deep skin hydration for prolonged improvements in skin texture and firmness.
Both treatments stimulate collagen and elastin production with minimal downtime, natural-looking results, and an overall enhancement of skin health. However, individuals should consult with a medical professional for personalized advice to make an informed decision about choosing between Sunekos and Profhilo for skin rejuvenation while weighing the treatment differences and personal preferences.
FAQs
1. What are the key differences between Sunekos and Profhilo?
Sunekos and Profhilo differ in their formulations and mechanisms of action. Sunekos combines hyaluronic acid with a mix of amino acids to target the extracellular matrix for better skin health and bioregeneration, while Profhilo primarily focuses on deep skin hydration to improve skin texture and firmness.
2. What are the benefits of Sunekos and Profhilo?
Both Sunekos and Profhilo offer minimal downtime, quick procedures, natural-looking results, reduced signs of aging, enhanced overall skin health and appearance, and improved quality of life.
3. How effective are Sunekos and Profhilo?
Clinical trials have demonstrated significant improvements in clinical and subjective assessments, as well as objective instrumental parameters, for Sunekos. Profhilo has shown that high concentrations of hyaluronic acid result in deep skin hydration, stimulating collagen and elastin production for improved skin texture, tightness, and overall skin health over an extended period.
References
- Injectable Fillers Guide. (2014, July 11). American Board of Cosmetic Surgery. https://www.americanboardcosmeticsurgery.org/procedure-learning-center/non-surgical/injectable-fillers-guide/
- Efficacy and Tolerance of Sunekos® 200. (n.d.). In Sunekos. Retrieved September 17, 2024, from https://www.sunekos.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Advertorial_Sunekos-200_v.2.pdf
- Sparavigna, A., & Tenconi, B. (2016). Efficacy and tolerance of an injectable medical device containing stable hybrid cooperative complexes of high- and low-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid: a monocentric 16 weeks open-label evaluation. Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology, 9, 297–305. https://doi.org/10.2147/CCID.S114450
