|
News
Pressuring Canada to cut off cheap drugs
2008-11-06 Never underestimate the power of a pharmaceutical industry out to protect
its profits from American customers living on Social Security and pensions.
It apparently can even reach out and pressure a sovereign nation into
action.
Well, another one besides the United States.
Now Canada seems about to cave in.
Supposedly to protect Canadians from drug shortages or prices being driven
up by U.S. demand (neither has happened), and to protect Canadian
physicians from temptation to be "unethical" (i.e., compassionate), the
Canadian health minister is drafting regulatory restrictions which, if they
go into effect in a couple of months, could prevent Internet pharmacies
from selling mail-order prescriptions to U.S. consumers.
It's a $700 million industry. Most of its 1.8 million American customers
are senior citizens whose Medicare does not include a drug plan - or at
least not a decent one. They are tired of paying up to twice as much for
their drugs in the free-market U.S. as people do in price-regulated
Canada.
"Re-importation," is technically illegal in the U.S. but the ban has not
been enforced. The drug manufacturers oppose it as undercutting their
higher-margin sales in the U.S.
Governors and lawmakers from border states, many Republican, encourage
their citizens to visit Canada for their prescriptions. The AARP seniors
have been lobbying heavily to allow reimportation, and last year the House
passed a bill legalizing it. The Senate might have if Majority Leader (and
M.D.) Bill Frist had allowed it to come up for a vote.
A couple of years ago, several major manufacturers threatened to stop
supplying drugs to pharmacies which reimported. That didn't work. And
Congress won't play ball. So now the industry is putting the screws on
Canada.
President Bush, whose presidential campaign received heavy pharmaceutical
industry funding, supports the ban on drug reimportation. ( "Socialized
medicine" lowered those prices.) He visited Canadian Prime Minister Paul
Martin last fall, and in a Nov. 30 meeting in Ottawa they discussed the
issue.
Soon after the health minister made his proposals. Coincidence?
His proposals strike at the system by which a customer faxes a prescription
written by his U.S. doctor plus his health history to a Canadian doctor,
who co-signs before the pharmacy ships the medicine.
He would forbid Canadian doctors to co-sign American prescriptions unless
they examine the patient, ban prescriptions for foreigners absent from
Canada and prohibit exporting drugs for which a shortage might develop.
No fair. Let's hope Canadians rise up against outside interference and bury
those restrictions.
More news:
• Child obesity gap widens among minorities (2010-09-07) • Vaccination rate still low for teens despite uptick (2010-09-01) • Drug-disposal bill gets Senate's nod (2010-08-24) • High cholesterol common in younger adults, but screening rates remain low (2010-08-16) • Patients' life circumstances an important factor in care (2010-08-12) • Medicaid pay commission to begin work in September (2010-08-09) • Verizon unveils Internet-based health information network (2010-08-06) • Organized medicine should take leadership role in quality, study says (2010-08-05) • Nixed Medicare consultation codes force doctors to make cutbacks (2010-08-02) • Cholesterol screening recommended for all children (2010-07-30) |